<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Microsoft Go Robotic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gorobotics.net/the-news/latest-news/will-microsoft-go-robotic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gorobotics.net/the-news/latest-news/will-microsoft-go-robotic</link>
	<description>How to Make / Build a Robot, Robotics Projects &#38; Robotics News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:11:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Auer</title>
		<link>http://www.gorobotics.net/the-news/latest-news/will-microsoft-go-robotic/comment-page-1#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Auer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gorobotics.net/wordpress/?p=350#comment-171</guid>
		<description>http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/06/20/79442_HNmicrosoftrobotics_1.html?source=NLC-TB2006-06-20 answers some of the questions from Microsoft&#039;s perspective.

I&#039;ve only had a backburner interest in this market to date.  Will this change things?  I&#039;m not a big Microsoft fan for a lot of reasons, but they do seem to be able to market to the masses in ways no one else can and stimulate others to step it up a notch.

I&#039;d love to hear what real robot geeks think will happen to the market over the next 2, 5, 10 years with Microsoft in the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/06/20/79442_HNmicrosoftrobotics_1.html?source=NLC-TB2006-06-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/06/20/79442_HNmicrosoftrobotics_1.html?source=NLC-TB2006-06-20</a> answers some of the questions from Microsoft&#8217;s perspective.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only had a backburner interest in this market to date.  Will this change things?  I&#8217;m not a big Microsoft fan for a lot of reasons, but they do seem to be able to market to the masses in ways no one else can and stimulate others to step it up a notch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear what real robot geeks think will happen to the market over the next 2, 5, 10 years with Microsoft in the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace Foo</title>
		<link>http://www.gorobotics.net/the-news/latest-news/will-microsoft-go-robotic/comment-page-1#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gorobotics.net/wordpress/?p=350#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how I can contact Tandy Trower? Or is there someone I can contact to get through him??

Thanks so much! The fact the Microsoft is going for robotics is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how I can contact Tandy Trower? Or is there someone I can contact to get through him??</p>
<p>Thanks so much! The fact the Microsoft is going for robotics is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.gorobotics.net/the-news/latest-news/will-microsoft-go-robotic/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gorobotics.net/wordpress/?p=350#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Grace,

I think your best bet would be to get on the [URL=http://blogs.msdn.com/microsoft_robotics_studio/] Robotics Studio blog[/URL] and post a comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grace,</p>
<p>I think your best bet would be to get on the [URL=http://blogs.msdn.com/microsoft_robotics_studio/] Robotics Studio blog[/URL] and post a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
